Knowledge, attitudes and practises of caretakers of malnourished children in Aweil East and North counties, South Sudan

Author(s): Cyprian Ouma BSc, CPHCE

Nutrition Technical CTC Advisor, World Vision Africa Regional Office, Kenya. [email protected]

Introduction

Malnutrition is a chronic public health problem in Aweil East and North counties with an estimated prevalence of between 15% and 25%.  

Underlying contributing factors include: political instability, poor infrastructures, droughts and floods resulting in low crop yields, poverty and limited awareness of good nutrition and health practices.

At the time of the survey there were six decentralised centres feeding severely and moderately malnourished children below 5 years. As well as feeding activities, nutrition and health education was given in order to improve health and nutrition awareness.

The objective of this survey was to assess knowledge, attitudes and practices of mothers (or caretakers) of children admitted in the feeding programme.

Methodology

The survey was conducted with the help of Tearfund in Aweil East and North counties in northern Bahr-el-Ghazal region in September 2006. This was two months after the feeding programme started when there were 1472 beneficiaries. The respondents were mothers/caretakers of:

  • children aged under 2 years who were in the feeding programme
  • breastfeeding children aged less than 6 months.

We selected a sample of 50 children from the 1472 beneficiaries using a systematic simple random sampling method (because the number of the children in each feeding centre was known). We interviewed their mothers/caretakers using a questionnaire to obtain information about their knowledge, attitudes and practices on various nutrition and health topics.

Results and discussion

Infant and young child feeding practices

Table 1 shows the responses on child feeding practices from the 50 respondents. Most (94%) had breastfed their babies within one hour of birth and 6% gave cow milk immediately.  82% breastfed on demand especially during daylight, and 69% breastfed 2-3 times at night.

Based on a 24-hour recall all the children aged above 6 months had eaten some kind of food in the previous 24 hours of which

  • 18% took food and milk once a day.
  • 58% ate food and 24% drank milk twice a day
  • 24% ate food and 28% drank milk 3 to 4 times a day.
  • 32% did not take milk at the time of the survey.

No mother used infant formula/powdered milk; 13 were unaware of oral dehydration salt solution (ORS). No child was taking ORS, supplements or medicines.

 

Table 1. Number and percentages of responses on child feeding practices

Practice

Yes

No

 

N

%

N

%

Breastfed baby less than an hour after delivery

47

94.0

3

6.0

Child was given cows milk immediately after birth

 3

6.0

47

94.0

Child was breastfeeding  at the time of the survey

39

78.0

11

22.0

For the 39 breastfeeding children:

 

 

 

 

  • Child fed on demand at night

12

30.7

27

69.3

  • Child fed on demand during daylight

32

82.1

7

17.9

Mother had heard of or seen ORS

37

74.0

13

26.0

24 hours prior to the survey child had taken:

 

 

 

 

  • Plain water

49

98.0

01

2.0

  • Sweetened or flavoured water

1

2.0

49

98.0

  • Tea or infusions

13

26.0

37

74.0

  • Infant formula/powdered milk

0

0.0

50

100

  • Fresh milk

34

68.0

16

32.0

  • Other liquids e.g. soup

47

94

3

6.0

  • Mushy or solid foods like cereals, porridge, stews

50

100

0

0.0

  • ORS

0

0.0

50

100

  • Vitamin, mineral supplement, medicine

0

0.0

50

100

Note: some variables received multiple responses.

 

In response to the question “When do you think it is best to give foods other than breast milk to the children”

58% of the respondents said they gave cow milk before 6 months of age and 40% started at or before the age of 3 months. 24% started complementary feeding after the age of 6 months (these were mainly mothers who had no access to cow milk).

Knowledge/Attitudes about food rations (Unimix, BP-5 and Plumpynut) and immunisation

All the mothers appreciated the food ration given to their children. They thought it improved the children’s health and the children enjoyed the ration more than the local foods at home.

Most mothers had good knowledge and attitudes towards immunisation and said it protected against diseases such as polio and measles. Two mothers did not like immunisations, especially the polio vaccine, because they said it made children sick; one mother said that the child’s father was against immunisation because it was against their culture. 

Knowledge about the causes of malaria, diarrhoea and malnutrition

When asked what causes malaria, diarrhoea and malnutrition mothers gave the following responses:

  • Malaria: 28 (56%) said mosquito bite; the rest did not know (9) or said hunger (7), exposure to cold (3), impure food and water (2), fatigue (2) or rain (1).
  • Diarrhoea: 41 (82%) said dirty water or food; 8 did not know and one said teething.
  • Malnutrition: 29 (58%) said diseases, 31 (62%) said lack of food; 16 did not know and 2 said ‘evil eye’.

Diarrhoea: prevalence, health-seeking behaviour and feeding

Respondents were asked:

  • “Has your child had diarrhoea in the last 24 hours?” Three (6%) answered yes.
  • “Has your child had diarrhoea during the last month?” 9 (18%) answered yes.

Of the 12 children who had had diarrhoea, 9 were taken to a health facility for treatment, 2 to a feeding centre and one was not taken for treatment.

Figure 1 shows that when children had diarrhoea most (>50%) ate, drank and breastfed as normal but that 33% ate less, 25% drank less and 8% breastfed less. Reducing food and fluid intake is an inappropriate way of managing diarrhoea and should be remedied through nutrition and health education.

 

Figure 1. Changes in feeding practices during diarrhoea

 

Practices related to water and hygiene

When asked what they did to make water safe, only 2 (4%) of respondents said they boiled their water, 21 (42%) said they filtered it and 27 (54%) did not treat water at all. Most people said they used treated water for drinking. However, a few also filtered water for bathing to prevent guinea worm infestation. The population receives cloth filters from the Carter Centre in accordance with the eradication of guinea worm policy in the area.

When asked when they wash their hands, only 6 (12%) of respondents said after using the latrine/defecating, 17 (34%) said before preparing food, 41 (82%) said before eating food and 36 (72%) said after eating food (see Figure 2).

When asked when they thought it was necessary to wash hands with soap, 38% of respondents said after using the latrine/defecating, 8% said before preparing food, 36% said before eating food and the majority (48%) said after eating food. However, only 14 (28%) of respondents said they actually used water and soap to wash hands, and only 6 (12%) after using a latrine; the rest used water alone. Only 9 (18%) used soap to wash dirty utensils.

 

Insert Figure 2. Number of respondents saying when they washed hands.

 

Conclusions

  • There were good breastfeeding practices in the community.
  • Complementary feeding practises were not very good:
    • the majority of children were fed food and milk two or less times a day
    • the age at which complementary foods were introduced ranged from one to 12 months; therefore some children received these foods too early and some too late.
  • Almost all mothers accepted that immunisation protected against childhood diseases.
  • All the mothers thought the food ration improved their children’s nutritional status.
  • For diarrhoea most respondents’ health seeking behaviour was good, but for many its nutritional management was relatively poor. Many either reduced or did not increase fluid or food intake.
  • More respondents knew the cause of diarrhoea compared to causes of malaria and malnutrition. However, few had good hygiene practices (hand washing and boiling drinking water) that help to prevent diarrhoea.
  • Most people used water without soap for washing their hands and utensils. However the survey did not investigate whether people could afford soap or if they normally bought it.
  • As well as attitudes and behaviour, factors like availability and accessibility/affordability of products such as food and soap might have contributed to the low levels of putting knowledge into practice.

Recommendations

  1. There is need to continue with nutrition and health awareness in the feeding centres as well as in the community through continuous health and nutrition education.
  2. The nutrition extension workers should continue to visit the families of the beneficiaries to ensure that mothers and other caretakers put the knowledge acquired into practice. 
  3. Distribution of soap in the feeding programme remains necessary in order to improve hygiene practices. 
  4. There is a need to further study complementary feeding practices and to intervene appropriately.

 

Acknowledgement: thanks to Tearfund, the staff of Aweil East and North counties and the respondents.