Preventing malaria during pregnancy: factors determining the use of insecticide-treated bed-nets and intermittent preventive therapy in Juba
Abstract
The study was carried out among 334 pregnant and newly delivered women seen at Juba Teaching Hospital in 2009. The objective was to assess the coverage of insecticide-treated bed-nets (ITN) and Intermittent Preventive Therapy (IPT) among these women and the factors associated with their use. Overall 87% of the women used ITN and 61% used IPT. ITN use was positively associated with buying nets, indoor spraying of insecticide and higher household income. IPT use was positively associated with more frequent antenatal clinic visits, indoor spraying and buying ITN.
Introduction
Studies show that malaria infections are higher in first and second pregnancies than subsequent ones (1). In South Sudan, as in other places, malaria is a cause of:
- maternal anaemia
- intra-uterine growth retardation
- low birth weight
- stillbirths and abortions, and
- maternal mortality (2, 3)
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends IPT in pregnancy after studies showed that it reduced the prevalence of maternal anaemia and low birth weight (4, 5). The drug acts by clearing malaria parasites from the placenta during the period of rapid foetal growth (6).
Ministry of Health guidelines for reducing malaria during pregnancyIn accordance with WHO recommendations, the guidelines for reducing malaria during pregnancy in South Sudan are:
SSMJ plans to have an article on malaria in pregnancy in a future issue. |
To date there is no documentation on the coverage and determinants of the use of ITN or IPT in pregnancy in South Sudan. So the objective of this study was to fill this information gap.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was carried out between September and November 2009 at Juba Teaching Hospital (JTH). The Cochran formula (z2x p (1-p)/d2) was used to estimate the minimum sample size assuming the proportion of pregnant women using ITN (or IPT) was 33% (8, 1), a 95% confidence interval and a precision of 5%.
The participants were pregnant women attending the ante-natal clinic (ANC) in their second and third trimesters and women in the maternity ward in the immediate period after delivery. Every sixth woman meeting the inclusion criteria and giving her consent was selected. A total of 334 women were recruited – 167 from ANC and 167 from the ward. Data were collected on:
- use of ITN and IPT during pregnancy
- attitudes towards IPT
- how bed-nets were acquired
- ANC attendance
- indoor spraying of insecticide
- general knowledge and attitudes about the cause and prevention of malaria
- age, employment, education, monthly household income and parity.
Statistical Analysis
Epi Info version 3.4.3 statistical software was used for data entry and analysis. A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out on the use of ITN. Differences in proportions were analyzed using Chi square tests or Fisher exact test where appropriate. During bivariate analysis for factors associated with ITN and IPT use the measure of association was Odds Ratio (OR). A P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered a statistically significant association.
Factors that were significant during bivariate analysis (P≤0.05) were used as independent variables in the unconditional multiple logistic regression where a backward stepwise elimination method was used to obtain the final model. During the backward stepwise methods all the significant factors were entered in the model and the regression run until only factors that were significant (at P≤0.05) were retained in the model which was the final “best” model. This allowed for the assessment of measures of association among nested levels of the factors retained in the model.
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics of participants (for full details see Table 1 in the Annex)
The majority of women were in the 18-31 year age group (the mean age was 24 (±5.4) years); most were unemployed or housewives (74%) and Christian (79%). Two thirds had attained primary or secondary education while 27% had not gone to school. The monthly income of the husbands of more than half of the women was between 500-1000 Sudanese pounds (approximately US$185-370).
The overall use of ITN was 87% (n = 296; 95% CI = 85% - 92%) and of IPT was 61% (n = 204; 95% CI = 56% - 63%). The use of ITN and IPT was highest among women who:
- were aged 32 years and above
- were formally employed
- had attained secondary school education
- had a monthly household income above 1,000 Sudanese Pounds.
There was no significant difference in use of ITN and IPT among Christians and Muslims.
Factors associated with ITN use (for full details see Table 2 in the Annex)
Bivariate analyses for factors associated with ITN use showed that the following factors were statistically significant at P≤ 0.05: buying ITN; being on the third or more ANC visit; household monthly income of ≤ US$ 100; use of indoor spraying to prevent mosquito bites; no education; doing nothing to prevent mosquito bites; Christianity; awareness that mosquitoes cause malaria and use of IPT.
These factors were used to obtain the final “best fit model” and only three of these were independently associated with ITN use in pregnancy in the study. Those who had bought ITNs and those who used residual indoor spraying were more likely to sleep under insecticide treated nets. However women with low incomes were found to be less likely to use bed-nets.
Factors associated with IPT use (for full details see Table 3 in the Annex)
Bivariate analyses for factors associated with IPT use showed that the following factors were statistically significant at P≤ 0.05: buying ITN; being on the third or more ANC visit; a household monthly income of ≤ US $100; use of indoor spraying for preventing mosquito bites, no education and starting ANC at above six months gestation.
Again, from the final best fit model only three factors were found to be independently associated with IPT use, namely, the buying of ITN, use of indoor spraying, and having attended three or more ANC visits.
Discussion
Eighty seven percent of women reported using ITN. This is almost twice that reported in Tanzania (9) and surpassed the target for the Abuja Declaration which set a target of 60% ITN coverage. Although this indicates that the target has been reached only one facility was covered in this study and more studies need to be done. Sixty one percent of women used IPT.
The highest proportion of both ITN and IPT users were in the 32-38 year-old group. Women who were formally employed and who were better educated had higher IPT and ITN use than women in the informal sector or with poorer education. This might be because the formally employed women have regular incomes and were more able to buy IPT. Those with a higher household income also had high IPT use. Formally employed women are likely to be better educated and hence know more about preventing malaria. Women with secondary education, or whose husbands had a university education, were also higher users of IPT.
The factors independently associated with both IPT and ITN use were:
- Buying ITN. These findings are in line with those from Kenya (10) and Congo Brazzaville (11) where it was shown that the poorest households had poorer access to the tools for preventing malaria than richer ones. A low income was negatively associated with ITN use.
- Use of indoor spraying.
Visiting ANC three or more times was associated with increased IPT use. This indicated that the more the women go for ANC, the more knowledge they acquire and the more likely they are to receive IPT.
Recommendations
- · The Ministry of Health should undertake further studies to find out whether the Abuja targets have been achieved in other health facilities.
- · There should be rigorous public health education on the use of ITNs in addition to subsidizing ITNs or giving them out for free.
- · The Ministry of Health should undertake rigorous awareness campaigns to educate mothers on the importance of regular ANC visits and IPT use targeting especially those with lower incomes or less education.
- · There should also be further studies on the use of IPT in pregnancy to assess their impact since their introduction into the government’s health policy.
Acknowledgements
We thank the following people for their support: Donna Jones, Dr Joe Oundo, Ahmed Abade, Dr Atem Nathan Riak, Dr Majok Yak Majok, Dr John Rumunu, Dr Munir Christo, Dr Olivia Lomoro, Dr Merghani Abdallah, Jemelia Sake and Remo James. Our sincere gratitude goes to the Juba Teaching Hospital staff and study participants.
The study was approved by the Ethical Board of the Directorate of Research, Planning and Health Systems Development in the Ministry of Health in the Government of Southern Sudan.
References
- Brabin B. An Assessment of Low-Birth-Weight Risk in Primiparae As An Indicator of Malaria Control in Pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol; 1991. 20:276-283.
- Adam I., Khamis A.H. and Elbashir M.I. Prevalence and risk factors for anaemia in pregnant women of Eastern Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005; 90:739–43
- Dafallah S.E., EL-Agib F.H. and Bushra G.O. Maternal mortality in a teaching hospital in Sudan. Saudi Med J 2003; 24:369–73.
- Shulman C.E., Dorman E.K.., Cutts F., Kawuondo K., Bulmer J.N., Peshu N. and Marsh K. Intermittent sulphadoxine–pyrimethamine to prevent severe anaemia secondary to malaria in pregnancy: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 632–636.
- Newman R.D., Moran A.C., Kayentao K., Kayentao K., Benga-De E., Yameogo M., Gaye O., Faye O., Lo Y., Moreira P.M., Doumbo O., Parise M.E. and Steketee R.W. Prevention of malaria during pregnancy in West Africa: policy change and the power of sub- regional action. Trop Med Int Health 2006; 11: 462–469.
- WHO/AFRO. A strategic framework for malaria prevention and control during pregnancy in the African region. AFR/MAL/04/01 2004
- Malaria Control Strategic Plan, Draft Proposal, Ministry of Health Government of Southern Sudan, April 2006
- Pettifor A., Taylor E., Nku D., Duvall S., Tabala M., Meshnick S. and Behets F. Bed net ownership, use and perceptions among women seeking antenatal care in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC): Opportunities for improved maternal and child health. BMC Public Health, 2008; 8:331
- Marchant T., Schellenberg J. A., Edgar T., Nathan R., Abdulla S., Mukasa O., Mponda H. and Lengeler, C. Socially marketed insecticide-treated nets improve malaria and anaemia in pregnancy in southern Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2002; 7 no 2 pp 149±158
- Guyatt, H.L., Corlett, S.K., Robinson, T.P., Ochola S.A. and Snow R.W. (2002). Malaria prevention in highland Kenya: indoor residual house-spraying vs. insecticide-treated bednets. Trop Med Int Health 2002; 7: 298–303.
- Carme B., Plassart H., Senga P. and Nzingoula S. Cerebral malaria in African children: Socioeconomic risk factors in Brazzaville, Congo. AmJ Trop Med Hyg. 1994; 50: 131–6
Further reading
- Gutman J. & Slutsker L. Malaria control in pregnancy: still a long way to go The Lancet Infectious Diseases March 2011; 11 (3): 157-159 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70311-X).
- van Eijk A-M. etal Coverage of malaria protection in pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis and analysis of national survey data The Lancet Infectious Diseases March 2011 11 (3) 190-207 (doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70295-4).
Annex
Table 1. Distribution of participants’ use of IPT and ITN according to their socio-demographic characteristics
Socio demographic characteristics |
Total enrolled |
IPT users
|
ITN users |
|||||
n |
% |
n |
% |
|||||
Total |
334 |
204 |
61 |
296 |
87 |
|||
Age in years |
||||||||
<18 |
49 |
32 |
65 |
41 |
84 |
|||
18-24 |
147 |
87 |
59 |
131 |
89 |
|||
25-31 |
101 |
58 |
57 |
89 |
88 |
|||
32-38 |
29 |
21 |
72 |
27 |
93 |
|||
>39 |
4 |
4 |
100 |
4 |
100 |
|||
Occupation |
|
|||||||
Formal Employment |
37 |
28 |
76 |
34 |
92 |
|||
Housewife/unemployed |
247 |
152 |
61 |
219 |
88 |
|||
Informal employment |
24 |
09 |
38 |
21 |
88 |
|||
Student |
24 |
14 |
58 |
21 |
88 |
|||
Others |
1 |
1 |
100 |
1 |
100 |
|||
Education level of participant |
||||||||
None |
90 |
47 |
52 |
74 |
82 |
|||
Primary |
106 |
60 |
57 |
95 |
90 |
|||
Secondary |
115 |
83 |
72 |
106 |
92 |
|||
College/University |
23 |
14 |
61 |
21 |
91 |
|||
Participant's husband education level |
||||||||
None |
57 |
30 |
53 |
47 |
83 |
|||
Primary |
48 |
26 |
54 |
44 |
92 |
|||
Secondary |
169 |
106 |
63 |
151 |
89 |
|||
College/University |
60 |
42 |
70 |
54 |
90 |
|||
Husband monthly income |
||||||||
250 SDG and below |
139 |
74 |
53 |
113 |
81 |
|||
500-1,000 SDG |
186 |
123 |
66 |
174 |
94 |
|||
>1,000 SDG |
9 |
7 |
78 |
9 |
100 |
|||
Religion |
||||||||
Christianity |
264 |
163 |
62 |
228 |
86 |
|||
Muslim |
65 |
40 |
62 |
64 |
99 |
|||
Traditional |
5 |
1 |
20 |
4 |
80 |
|||
Table 2. Factors significantly associated with ITN use in Pregnancy during Bivariate and subsequent Multivariate Analysis among participants
|
ITN USE |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Characteristics |
Yes NO |
Bivariate analysis |
Multivariate analysis |
|||||||||||||
n (%) n (%) |
COR |
95%CI |
P-Value |
AOR |
95%CI |
P-Value |
||||||||||
|
426 |
91.6-1980.39 |
0.001 |
504.1 |
91.50-2777.93 |
<0.001 |
||||||||||
Yes |
284(96) |
2(5) |
||||||||||||||
No |
12(4) |
36(95) |
||||||||||||||
|
14.4 |
2.08-114.0 |
0.001 |
16.6 |
1.33-206.22 |
0.029 |
||||||||||
Yes |
87(29) |
1(3) |
||||||||||||||
No |
209(70) |
37(97) |
||||||||||||||
|
0.3 |
0.14-0.59 |
0.001 |
0.17 |
0.04-0.71 |
0.015 |
||||||||||
Yes |
113(88) |
26(68) |
||||||||||||||
No |
183(62) |
12(32) |
||||||||||||||
|
0.4 |
0.17-0.79 |
0.016 |
Not Significant |
||||||||||||
Yes |
38(13) |
11(29) |
||||||||||||||
No |
258(87) |
27(71) |
||||||||||||||
|
8.6 |
2.05-35.91 |
0.0035 |
Not Significant |
||||||||||||
Yes |
292(99) |
34(90) |
||||||||||||||
No |
4(1) |
4(10) |
||||||||||||||
|
0.5 |
0.23-0.92 |
0.041 |
Not Significant |
||||||||||||
Yes |
74(25) |
16(42) |
||||||||||||||
No |
222(75) |
22(58) |
||||||||||||||
|
0.7 |
0.21-0.99 |
0.075 |
Not Significant |
||||||||||||
Yes |
47(16) |
11(29) |
||||||||||||||
No |
249(84) |
27(71) |
||||||||||||||
|
0.2 |
0.04-0.79 |
0.02 |
Not Significant |
||||||||||||
Yes |
228(77) |
36(95) |
||||||||||||||
No |
68(23) |
2(5) |
||||||||||||||
|
3.1 |
1.52-6.19 |
0.002 |
Not Significant |
||||||||||||
Yes |
190(64) |
14(37) |
||||||||||||||
No |
106(36) |
24(63) |
||||||||||||||
|
Table 3. Factors significantly associated with IPT use in pregnancy during bivariate and subsequent multivariate analysis among participants
|
IPT Use |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Characteristics |
Yes |
NO |
Bivariate analysis |
|
Multivariate analysis |
|
|||||
n (%) |
n (%) |
COR |
95%CI |
P-Value |
AOR |
95%CI |
P-Value |
|
|||
1.≥3 ANC Visits |
4.2 |
2.65-6.75 |
<0.001 |
4.0 |
2.49-6.47 |
<0.001 |
|
||||
Yes |
141 (69) |
45 (35) |
|
||||||||
No |
63 (31) |
85 (65) |
|
||||||||
2. Indoor spraying |
2.5 |
1.45-4.40 |
0.001 |
2.2 |
1.21-3.91 |
0.009 |
|
||||
Yes |
67 (33) |
21 (16) |
|
||||||||
No |
137 (67) |
109 (84) |
|
||||||||
3. Bought ITN |
2.5 |
1.35-4.70 |
0.005 |
2.0 |
1.02-3.91 |
0.045 |
|
||||
Yes |
184(90) |
102 (79) |
|
||||||||
No |
20 (10) |
28 (22) |
|
||||||||
4. House hold income < 90USD |
0.6 |
0.36-0.89 |
0.017 |
Not significant |
|
||||||
Yes |
74 (36) |
65 (50) |
|
||||||||
No |
130 (64) |
65 (50) |
|
||||||||
5. No education of participant |
0.6 |
0.37-0.99 |
0.059 |
Not significant |
|
||||||
Yes |
47(23) |
43 (33) |
|
||||||||
No |
157 (77) |
87 (67) |
|
||||||||
6. ANC > 6 months |
0.6 |
0.34-0.97 |
0.049 |
Not significant |
|
||||||
Yes |
38 (19) |
37 (28) |
|
||||||||
No |
166 (81) |
93 (72) |
|
||||||||